Impact of Level of Surgery on the Functional Outcomes in Patients with Lower Extremity Bone Tumors Undergoing Amputation Versus Limb Salvage Surgery.

Limb salvage surgery is the preferred treatment for bone tumors in the current surgical practice. The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcomes between amputation and limb salvage surgery based on the level of surgery at two levels: knee and hip. A single institutional analysis of 137 patients with lower extremity bone tumors was done between 2014 and 2020. Eighty-seven patients treated with amputation were compared with 50 patients treated with limb salvage surgery based on following variables: age, gender, histology, anatomic site, and MSTS score. The mean MSTS scores were fairly better in patients who underwent surgery at knee level compared to those who underwent surgery at hip level. The mean MSTS score at 1-year follow-up was 22.0 in amputation group compared to 22.4 in limb salvage group, whereas at 2-year follow-up was 24.1 in amputation group compared to 25.1 in limb salvage group. At knee level, functional outcomes were similar after amputation and limb salvage. At hip level, patients undergoing amputation had poorer MSTS scores compared to limb salvage surgery at 2-year follow-up (p = 0.04). The functional outcomes for patients undergoing surgery at knee level were similar irrespective of type of surgery. At longer follow-up, patients undergoing amputation at hip level had a poorer functional outcome compared to limb salvage surgery. Although limb salvage was associated with similar MSTS scores when compared with amputation, it produced a better functional outcome especially for proximally located tumors.

Prognostic Value of Tumor Markers in Gastric Cancer: A Tertiary Cancer Centre Experience.

OBJECTIVES: Gastric cancer is a heterogeneous malignancy in terms of stage-wise prognosis. This study aimed at finding any prognostic significance of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen (CA) 19-9 in resectable gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of 57 patients at Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, India from January 2022 to March 2023 were included in this observational prospective study. Included patients had a resectable tumor at clinical staging. Patients were divided into two categories (raised and non-raised) based on serum tumor marker (CEA and CA 19-9) levels. Their relationship with clinicopathological features was studied. The association was studied using chi-square test, and p-value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The mean age of the study group was 55.47 years with male predominance (63.2%, n=36). Raised CEA and CA 19-9 were seen in 15.8% (n=9) and 10.5% (n=6) patients, respectively, while both markers were raised in 5.3% (n=3). Raised CEA was found significantly associated with grade 3 adenocarcinoma stomach (OR 7.825, 95%CI: 1.374-44.562; p= 0.020) and intraoperative finding of inoperability due to occult intra-abdominal disease (p<0.05). CA 19-9 (pre- and post-operative levels) had no statistically significant association (p>0.05) with the grade of adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: This study indicates a benefit in estimating CEA for the prediction of prognosis in gastric cancer. CEA levels have been found to predict chances of finding occult intra-abdominal metastasis in gastric cancer.

Who Needs Level III Lymph Node Dissection in Carcinoma Breast-Study from a Tertiary Care Center.

In Indian females, breast cancer is the most common cancer with a late stage of presentation leading to one-third of patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Our study is undertaken to find out predictors of level III axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer and who needs complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Retrospective study of 146 patients who undergone MRM or breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with complete ALND at Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology was done, and data was analyzed to find out the frequency of level III lymph nodes and the demographic relation and its relation to positive lymph nodes in level I + II. Positive metastatic level III lymph node was found in 6% of patients, with the median age of the patient in our study with level III positivity was 48.5 years with 63% pathological stage II with 88% perinodal spread (PNS)- and lymphovascular invasion (LVI)-positive. Involvement of level III lymph node was associated with gross disease in level I + II lymph node having more than four lymph node-positive and with pT3 stage or more which has higher chances of level III lymph node involvement. Level III lymph node involvement, though rare in early-stage breast cancer, is associated with larger clinical and pathological sizes (T3 or more), more than 4 lymph node-positive in level I + II and with PNS and LVI. Hence, based on these results, we recommend that for inpatient with more than 5-cm tumor size and those with the gross disease in axilla, complete ALND is recommended.

Outcomes of Cancer Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Preparedness to Practising Continuous Cancer Care.

The COVID-19 pandemic has placed unprecedented pressure on healthcare services. Deprioritisation of nonemergency clinical services and growing concerns of adverse outcomes of COVID-19 in cancer patients is having a deleterious impact across oncologic practice. We report cancer surgery outcomes taking into account the acuity of the COVID-19 situation. A prospectively maintained database of the Department of Surgical Oncology was analysed from 1st May to 30th June, 2020, to evaluate the perioperative outcomes, morbidity and mortality following major surgical procedures. A total of 359, preoperatively, tested negative for COVID-19 underwent surgery. Median age was 52 years with 26.7% (n = 96) above the age of 60 years. Sixty-one percent (n = 219) patients were American Society of Anaesthesiology grades II-III. As per surgical complexity grading, 36.8% (n = 132) cases were lower grades (I-III) and 63.2% (n = 227) were complex surgeries (IV-VI). 5.3% (n = 19) had ≥ grade III Clavien-Dindo complication, and the postoperative mortality rate was 0.27% (n = 1). Major complication rates in patients > 60 years were 9.3% in comparison to 4.1% in < 60 years (p = 0·63). The median hospital stay was 1-10 days across subspecialties. Postoperatively, repeat COVID 19 testing in 2 suspected patients were negative. Our study showed that after screening, triaging and prioritisation, asymptomatic cases may undergo cancer surgeries without increased morbidity during COVID-19 pandemic.

Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcomes in Extraskeletal Ewing Sarcoma: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma (ESE) is a lesser-known, rarer counterpart of Ewing sarcoma of bone. This single-center study sought to evaluate the prognosticators and outcomes following multimodality therapy in patients with ESE. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with ESE, treated between 2013 and 2018 with a standardized protocol and multimodality therapy using established doxorubicin-based regimens, were followed-up to assess outcomes. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 20 (range 7-56) years, and 57.4% were male. Median tumor size was 7 (range 2-21) cm. The symptom-duration ranged from 1 to 8 (median 4) months. Tumor-site was trunkal in 61.7%, extremity in 23.4%, and head and neck 14.9%. Of the 35 patients with nonmetastatic disease at presentation, 13 underwent upfront surgery. The rest received chemotherapy followed by local treatment, which was surgical in 15 and radiotherapy in 5. At median follow-up of 24 (range 5-98) months, 55.3% patients had experienced events, and 29.8% had died of progressive disease. Three-year event-free survival was 41.1%, and overall survival was 53%. On univariate analysis, trunkal location, upfront surgery, and positive surgical margins were associated with inferior EFS. Trunkal tumors and upfront surgery were also associated with poorer OS. On multivariate analysis, trunkal location and margin-positive resections retained statistical significance for adverse EFS. CONCLUSIONS: Unless clearly resectable upfront, ESE should be downstaged with chemotherapy before local treatment. A margin-negative resection should be the objective when performing surgery. Definitive radiotherapy is an alternative in tumors not amenable for complete excision or when anticipated postoperative morbidity precludes radical surgery.

Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Is Image Localization Alone Sufficient to Ensure Long-Term Cure in Unifocal Disease?

INTRODUCTION: Advances in imaging have facilitated precise preoperative localization and focused resection of hyperfunctional parathyroids in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). Combining imaging techniques or a "dual" approach, when concordant, improves adenoma-localizing accuracy above individual modalities. This study sought to assess biochemical cure and failure rates (persistence or recurrence) of surgery directed by dual imaging alone in PHPT. METHODOLOGY: This observational, single-center analysis comprised 31 patients diagnosed with PHPT and imaged with both ultrasound (USG) of the neck and sestamibi scintigraphy. The extent of surgery was based solely on inter-modality concurrence for adenoma localization; imaging-concordant patients underwent focused parathyroidectomy, whereas discordant patients necessitated neck exploration (with extent altered according to scintigraphic lesion lateralization). No intraoperative localizing adjuncts were used. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients had concordant imaging, of which 19 underwent focused exploration, with sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) for dual imaging of 100% and 95.7%, respectively. The overall sensitivity and PPV were 92.9% and 89.7% for USG alone and 100% and 93.6% for scintigraphy, respectively. The mean age and prevalence of thyroid disease were significantly higher in the discordant group. All patients achieved postoperative normocalcemia. There were no cases of persistent or recurrent hyperparathyroidism on follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In the imaging-concordant setting, focused surgery may be safely performed with the omission of other adjuncts for localization. Older age and concomitant thyroid pathology predispose to discordant imaging and are risk factors for surgical failure when attempting an image-directed approach. Neck exploration is an alternative in these patients with excellent cure rates and acceptable morbidity.

Contemporary Surgical, Oncological, and Survival Outcomes of Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumours: a 5-Year Experience from Tertiary Cancer Center.

With advances in surgical management of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), mortality rate for PD has been reported to be less than 5%. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a major complication and morbidity after PD with incidence of up to 40%. This is a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent PD in a tertiary cancer referral center in southern India. Data was collected for the patients operated during the period from Jan 2014 to Dec 2018. Surgicopathological, oncological, and survival outcomes were described. Of 76 patients presumed as operable, 16 were excluded and data analyzed for 60 patients. Forty-four percent underwent classical Whipple's PD and 56% pylorus-preserving PD. The most common postoperative complications were wound infection (25%); pneumonia (20%); clinically relevant POPF (13%); and delayed gastric emptying (19%). Thirty-day in-hospital mortality was 5%, 90-day mortality was 8.3%, and fistula-related mortality was 1.6%. Ampullary cancer was the most common histology. Three-year survival rate was 23.3% with a mean overall survival of 33.2 months with significantly better survival in the node negative than positive group (41.3 vs 20.5 months, P = 0.003) and significantly lower survival in pancreatic head cancer than other tumor histologies (16.6 vs 37.3 months, P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis has shown pancreatic head histology (HR = 2.38, 95% CI (1.08-5.26), P = 0.033) and nodal positivity (HR = 2.38, 95% CI (1.27-4.44), P = 0.007) as poor prognostic factors. Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a safe operation in experienced hands. Adhering to a meticulous adaptable reproducible anastomotic technique with standard perioperative management strategies significantly decreases the operative morbidity and mortality.

Factors Affecting Prognosis and Survival in Extremity Osteosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Osteosarcoma is a malignant bone tumor affecting mainly children and young adults and commonly involves extremities. The aim of this study was to assess the patient-related, tumor-related, and treatment-related factors affecting the overall survival in patients with non-metastatic extremity osteosarcoma. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective, single institutional study of 100 patients with non-metastatic extremity osteosarcoma was done between 2014 and 2019. Age, sex, histologic type, tumor site, use of preoperative chemotherapy and its duration, response to chemotherapy, type of surgery, presence of local recurrence, occurrence of lung metastasis, and survival data were recorded. Survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier method. p < 0.05 by log-rank test was considered statistically significant. Statistical data were analyzed using SPSS v.25(IBM). RESULTS: The median age of presentation was 18 years with male sex preponderance. The most common site of presentation was distal femur, and commonest histological variant was osteoblastic osteosarcoma. Incidence of local recurrence was 9%, and lung metastasis was identified in 12% on follow-up. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 65.5%, and 5-year local recurrence-free survival was 57.6%. The 5-year OS in neoadjuvant chemotherapy group was 80% compared to 39.5% in upfront surgery group (p = 0.015). The 5-year OS in patients with tumor necrosis > 90% and < 90% was 93.2% and 71.2%, respectively (p = 0.038). The 5-year OS in patients without lung metastasis was 76%, whereas none who developed lung metastasis has survived 5 years (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, good response to chemotherapy, and the absence of lung metastasis on follow-up can independently predict better overall survival.

Operative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer.

Background There is a recent rise in the incidence of esophageal carcinoma in India. Surgical resection with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiation is the current treatment modality of choice. Postoperative complications, especially pulmonary complications, affect many patients who undergo open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) could reduce the pulmonary complications and reduce the postoperative stay. Methodology We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 114 patients with esophageal cancer in the department of surgical oncology at a tertiary cancer center in South India between January 2019 and March 2020. We included patients with resectable cancer of middle or lower third of the esophagus, and gastroesophageal junction tumors (Siewert I). MIE was performed in 27 patients and 78 patients underwent open esophagectomy (OE). The primary outcome measured was postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher within 30 days. Other outcomes measured include overall mortality within 30 days, intraoperative complications, operative duration and the length of hospital stay. Results A postoperative complication rate of 18.5% was noted in the MIE group, compared with 41% in the OE group ( p = 0.034). Pulmonary complications were noted in 7.4% in the MIE group compared to 25.6% in the OE group ( p = 0.044). Postoperative mortality rates, intraoperative complications, and other nonpulmonary postoperative complications were almost similar with MIE as with open esophagectomy. Although the median operative time was more in the MIE group (260 minutes vs. 180 minutes; p < 0.0001), the median length of hospital stay was shorter in patients undergoing MIE (9 days vs. 12 days; p = 0.0001). Conclusions We found that MIE resulted in lower incidence of postoperative complications, especially pulmonary complications. Although, MIE was associated with prolonged operative duration, it resulted in shorter hospital stay.

Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: Short-Term Oncological Outcomes of Initial 178 Cases.

Emerging techniques in minimally invasive rectal resection include robotic total mesorectal excision (R-TME). The Da Vinci Surgical System offers precise dissection in narrow and deep confined spaces and is gaining increasing acceptance during recent times. The aim of this study is to analyse our initial experience of R-TME with Da Vinci Xi platform in terms of perioperative and oncological outcomes in the context of data from recently published randomised ROLARR trial amongst minimally invasive novice surgeons. Patients who underwent R-TME or tumour specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer between May 2016 and November 2019 were identified from a prospectively maintained single institution colorectal database. Demographic, clinical-pathological and short-term oncological outcomes were analysed. Of the 178 patients, 117 (65.7%) and 31 (17.4%) patients had lower and mid third rectal cancer. Most of the tumours were locally advanced, cT3-T4: 138 (77.5%). One hundred/178 (56.2%) underwent sphincter preserving TME. Eighty-seven (48.8%) were grade II adenocarcinoma. Nonmucinous adenocarcinoma was the predominant histology, 138 (78.4%). One hundred one cases (56.7%) were pT3. The mean number of lymph node yield was 13 ± 5. Distal resection margin and circumferential resection margin were positive in 2 (1.12%), 12 cases (6.74%) respectively. Eleven cases (6.7%) had to be converted to open TME. Mean blood loss and duration of surgery was 170 ± 60 ml and 286 ± 45 min respectively. Five percent cases had an anastomotic leak. Grade IIIa-IIIb Clavien Dindo (CD) morbidity score was reported to be in 12 (6.75%) and 10 (5.61%) cases. Median length of hospitalisation was 7 days (range 4-14 days). Perioperative and pathologic outcomes following robotic rectal resection is associated with good short-term oncological outcomes and is safe, effective, and reproducible by a minimally invasive novice surgeon.

Robotic Complete Mesocolic Excision with Central Vascular Ligation for Right Colon Cancer: Surgical Technique and Short-term Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive colorectal surgery has demonstrated to have the same oncological results as open surgery, with better clinical outcomes. Robotic assistance is an evolution of minimally invasive technique. PURPOSE: The study aims to present technical details and short-term oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) for right colon cancer. METHODOLOGY: Fifty-two consecutive patients affected by right colon cancer were operated between May 2016 and February 2020 with da Vinci Xi platform. Data regarding surgical and short-term oncological outcomes were systematically collected in a colorectal specific database for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-seven (71.15%) and 15 (28.85%) patients underwent right and extended right hemicoletomy with an extracorporeal anastomosis. Median age was 55 years. Mean operative time was 182 ± 36 min. Mean blood loss was 110 ± 90 ml. Conversion rate was 3.84% (two cases). 78.84% (41 cases) were pT3 and mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 28 ± 4. 1/52 (1.92%) had a documented anastomotic leak requiring exploratory laparotomy and diversion proximal ileostomy. Surgery-related grade IIIa-IIIb Calvien Dindo morbidity were noted in 9.61% and 1.92%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Robotic assistance allows performance of oncological adequate dissection of the right colon with radical lymphadenectomy as in open surgery, confirming the safety and oncological adequacy of this technique, with acceptable results and short-term outcomes.

Survival Outcomes in Patients with Thymoma after Thymectomy in an Indian Scenario.

Thymomas are relatively slow growing with late presentation. Because of rarity and underreporting in India, there is an unmet need for evaluating the patient characteristics and assessing the factors affecting survival for standardizing the ideal modality of treatment in Indian population. A retrospective analysis of 96 patients with thymoma was done between 1998 and 2018. Patient characteristics, histopathological characteristics, operative outcomes, local recurrences, and survival outcomes were recorded. Survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier method, and statistical data were analyzed using SPSS version 25 (IBM). The incidence of thymoma was relatively high in 6th decade with no sex predilection. Common presenting symptoms were cough and dyspnea. Myasthenia gravis was noted in 30.2%, which resolved after thymectomy in 65.5% of patients. Most patients presented with Masaoka stages I and II, and predominant WHO histological types were B1 and AB. Complete resection was done in 69.8% cases, and local recurrence was noted in 15.6%. Median sternotomy was the most frequently used approach for thymectomy. The 5-year overall survival was 76%, with an excellent 5-year survival of 95% and 86% in stages I and II patients. Masaoka stage, WHO histologic type, completeness of surgery, and local recurrence did affect the survival significantly. Masaoka stages III and IV, histological type B3, incomplete resection during surgery, and presence of local recurrence did independently predict a worse overall survival.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-an Indian Perspective.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone in early breast cancer is an established standard of care. However, the same results have not been replicated in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We aim to examine the feasibility of SLNB in LABC patients post NACT to determine identification rates (IR) and false negative rates (FNR). This was a single tertiary cancer center-based prospective study from February 2017 to November 2018. Forty-four patients with LABC (T3, T4 with N0 or N1) were studied and response after NACT was assessed. Only those patients who were N0 or who converted from N1 to N0 after NACT were included. Those patients who remained node positive after NACT directly proceeded with axillary dissection without SLNB and were excluded from the study. Demographic and clinical data is expressed in ratios and percentage and presented in table format. The median age at the time of study was 45.18 years. Most of the patients had T3 and above (97.7%) and N1 (86.3%) disease at the start of neoadjuvant therapy. The mean number of axillary lymph nodes dissected was 13.97. Dual method of sentinel lymph node mapping (methylene blue dye and radiolabeled colloid) was used in 26 (59.1%) patients. At least 1 SLN was identified in 86.4% patients with 100% identification in those patients in whom the dual method of SLN mapping was used. Median of 2 SLN was removed. Overall, false negative rate was 21.4%. FNR was high with the single method of SLN mapping (50% and 33.3% with methylene blue and radioactive colloid respectively) while it was considerably low when both were used simultaneously (11%). An average of 2 (range 0-4) SLN were identified and FNR were zero when 2 or more SLN were identified. Our study shows that SLNB in patients with LABC post NACT though viable cannot be recommended at present due to unacceptable high FNR. However, this should not dissuade us from exploring recurrence-free survival and overall survival associated with such IR and FNR albeit strictly under a clinical trial setting.